Argusloop

Screen the Vessel, Not Just Its Name

ArgusTrade resolves every vessel to its IMO number and screens sanctions status, ownership, flag history, ports, and voyage activity using maritime intelligence. Every finding includes supporting evidence and references to applicable OFAC and UK/EU maritime guidance.

Maritime screening of vessels and ports in a trade transaction

Why banks use ArgusTrade

IMO-based vessel identification

ArgusTrade resolves every vessel to its IMO number before screening. This eliminates ambiguity caused by vessel renaming, duplicate names, or ownership changes and ensures screening is performed against the correct vessel.

Maritime intelligence beyond sanctions lists

Evaluate vessel ownership, management, flag history, AIS activity, ship-to-ship transfers, and voyage behavior alongside sanctions screening to identify higher-risk maritime activity.

Guidance-aligned findings

Every finding is mapped to relevant OFAC and UK/EU maritime advisories with supporting evidence, allowing compliance teams to investigate and document decisions consistently.

Integrated trade risk assessment

Maritime findings are evaluated alongside sanctions screening, goods screening, and TBML analytics within the same transaction, providing a complete compliance view.

The maritime compliance challenge

Maritime risk extends beyond vessel sanctions lists. Screening vessel names alone provides limited visibility into maritime sanctions risk. Vessel identity, ownership, routing, and voyage behavior all contribute to the overall compliance assessment.

Banks screening a vessel name while the vessel behind it has been renamedA vessel carrying more risk than its list status through owners, managers, flags, and insurersA voyage of AIS gaps and ship-to-ship transfers that no trade document recordsSanctioned ports, embargoed regions, and diversion-risk corridors along a shipping routeTrade finance deadlines leaving no room for manual vessel ownership and voyage checksExplicit OFAC and UK/EU enforcement expectations for maritime sanctions controls

Vessel names are unreliable

Vessels may be renamed during their operational life, while different vessels can share similar names. Accurate screening requires IMO-based identification rather than name matching alone.

Ownership structures create additional risk

Ownership and management relationships, frequent flag changes, insurance status, and carrier relationships can all indicate elevated sanctions exposure even when the vessel itself is not designated.

Voyage activity provides additional evidence

AIS gaps, ship-to-ship transfers, undeclared port calls, and unusual voyage patterns may indicate sanctions evasion or deceptive shipping practices.

Ports and routing matter

Sanctioned ports, embargoed regions, and diversion-risk corridors create compliance risks that cannot be identified through vessel screening alone.

Manual investigation is time-consuming

Investigating vessel ownership, voyage history, and maritime intelligence manually is difficult within trade finance processing timelines.

Regulatory expectations continue to evolve

Financial institutions are increasingly expected to demonstrate structured maritime sanctions controls aligned with OFAC and UK/EU guidance.

Better maritime risk decisions

  • Screen every vessel

    Resolve every vessel to its IMO identity and evaluate sanctions status, ownership, routing, and voyage activity across every transaction.

  • Improve vessel identification

    Reduce false positives and missed matches through IMO-based identity resolution rather than vessel name matching.

  • Identify deceptive maritime practices

    Detect AIS gaps, ship-to-ship transfers, unusual routing, and other indicators associated with sanctions evasion.

  • Evaluate route risk

    Identify sanctioned ports, embargoed regions, and diversion-risk routing before trade finance commitments are completed.

  • Support consistent investigations

    Provide investigators with ownership structures, voyage history, movement data, and regulatory guidance alongside every finding.

  • Maintain a complete audit trail

    Record every screening event, evidence source, reviewer action, and final decision for every maritime investigation.

Proven results

100%
transaction coverage
Every vessel resolved and screened during trade processing.
IMO
based identity resolution
Screen the vessel rather than the vessel name.
100%
guidance mapping
Every finding references applicable OFAC or UK/EU maritime guidance.
One
unified investigation workflow
Review vessel, sanctions, goods, and TBML findings within a single transaction record.

The maritime screening engine

Vessel identification and resolution

Extract vessel names, IMO numbers, carriers, ports, and voyage details from trade documents. Resolve every vessel to its IMO identity while identifying inconsistencies between document information and registry records.

Vessel sanctions and ownership screening

Screen vessels by IMO number while evaluating ownership structures, management companies, flag history, carrier relationships, and insurance information against applicable sanctions requirements.

The full maritime screening stack — vessel identity resolution, sanctions and ownership screening, voyage analytics, and port and route checks

Voyage analytics

Analyze AIS activity, ship-to-ship transfers, voyage history, port calls, and routing behavior to identify indicators associated with maritime sanctions evasion.

Port and route screening

Evaluate ports of loading, discharge, and transshipment against sanctioned ports, restricted regions, and higher-risk maritime corridors.

Workflow controls and audit

Support configurable approval gates, investigation workflows, and maker-checker controls. Every finding includes supporting evidence, movement history, ownership information, and applicable regulatory references.

How it works

Extract + IMO resolutionvessel resolved · 1.1s
Bill of LadingBOL-2024-63095 · PDF · 0.5 MB
Classified
Extracted fields4 / 4
Vessel name
MV Horizon
IMO
9412771
Carrier
OceanBridge Shipping
Voyage
Bandar Abbas → LA
Voyage recordAIS · resolved from IMO
Classified
Extracted fields4 / 4
Registry name
MV Aurora (prev.)
AIS gap
72h · Gulf
Flag history
4 flags / 2y
Owner
3-shell chain
Step 1

Extract and resolve

ArgusTrade extracts vessel names, IMO numbers, ports, carriers, and voyage information from trade documents. Every vessel is resolved to its IMO identity before screening begins.

Step 2

Screen vessels and voyages

The resolved vessel is evaluated against sanctions lists, ownership structures, management relationships, flag history, voyage activity, AIS behavior, and port restrictions using maritime intelligence.

Step 3

Review and decide

Findings are combined with the transaction's sanctions, goods, and TBML assessments to support a single risk decision. Compliance teams review supporting evidence, approve, escalate, request additional information, or block the transaction where required.

Step 4

Monitor and report

Transactions remain under monitoring until completion. Updated sanctions data and maritime intelligence automatically trigger re-screening where applicable, while every screening event and reviewer action is retained within the audit record.

See how ArgusTrade screens vessels and maritime risk.

Bring a real trade transaction. We'll show how ArgusTrade resolves vessel identities, evaluates maritime sanctions risks, and combines vessel intelligence with trade compliance workflows.